From Wolf's posting in Dec 2008

http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/topics/295595-new-pacer-motion-to-consider-whether-cases-should-be-related-filed-by-barco-n/messages/1023681#message

Dated: December 10, 2008
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
By: s/ Edward K. Runyan
Daniel J. O’Connor
Edward K. Runyan
Tod L. Gamlen
Attorneys for Plaintiff Barco N.V. (in Case No. 08-05398 HRL)
2 The ASUSTeK action has one additional defendant, MCM Portfolio LLC. Plaintiffs believe that MCM is merely a patent holding company that is owned or controlled by the other defendants, thus presenting no material difference in the identity of the defendants.