Re: panem et circenses/seannie GE - Billy
in response to
by
posted on
Jan 07, 2010 05:41PM
Please think about what you say.
"GE: I don't like bashing , because it serves no purpose, other than to hurt our SP and turn potential investors away."
You: "Bashing does not hurt the SP. Poor performance and lack of sustained revenue hurts the SP."
What purpose does it serve?
- Venting?
- Trying to influence the BoD who, per the bashing posts, supposedly care don't what shareholders think? That makes a lot of sense....
- Influence shareholders to sell or alert potential shareholders to stay away? Yup, that will really help.
If you have a used car to sell, and buyers are there looking at it, and I stand there yelling about what a POS it is, is the car going to sell? For how much?
Doesn't hurt?
And if PTSC is such a POS, why do you own it?
I'll grant you that "Poor performance and lack of sustained revenue hurts the SP", but do you really think you need to advise existing shareholders of this? Potential Shareholders, who with minimal DD would see the situation for what it is?
Tell me again what purpose it serves?
BTW, "bashing" by definition means saying greatly exagerated bad things about something with no foundation, while "pumping" means saying greatly exagerated good things about something without foundation ("to the moon!").
Still like bashing?
TIA,
SGE