"As for the BOD discussion, if it weren't for BOD apologists at every turn, the discussion would last for an hour and dissipate. The only thing that keeps it going are the foolish arguments on their behalf."

I suggest you have another look at the history there. Ignited made his post. No apologists appeared, at all with any apologies - just complaining about the old issue being rehashed yet again. Then you and a few others jumped on it, repeated, exagerated and blew it completely out of proportion, and then more people started responding to your posts. And predominently, what were the supposed apologists saying? One thing, "ENOUGH ALREADY!". We knew, we didn't forget, but thank you so much for the reminder - many, many immediately repeated reminders.

I responded with the following which didn't even mention the performance of the BoD, but focusing on the "here we go again" - the inevitable reminder. In hindsight, what I posted was pretty amazing:

"And making that post really helps. Maybe you and the 15 who gave this a thumbs up can drive us down to under 14 cents, and then sing the next stanza of the same old tune!

Do you really think that post is going to influence the BoD to step down? Is not the probability far greater that it would influence a long to sell or a prospective investor to look elsewhere for an investment?

Brilliant! Motive? Influence proxy votes? Maybe. Other?

JMHO,"

Crap! Did I plant the idea for how you could use this to cheat others?

SGE