I read the MA and, in my layman opinion, based on the way it is written, even if the Moore/TPL dispute resulted in TPL having no ownership (note that I say ownership and NOT beneficial licensing rights) of the MMP, the MA could stand. PTSC would continue to receive its proceeds from licensing, TPL would continue to be obligated to perform per the MA, and Moore would continue to get, from TPL, whatever they worked out or work out between themselves.

Layman opinion. And even if my interpretation of the words is spot on, I wasn't there when it was negotiated and executed, so I am not fully cognizant of the intent of the parties.

Awaiting input from others....

SGE