Many still think that posters control the sp. An example would be the complaints about some posters' critical stance on leadership's disclosure of GSA announcement.

There is no way critics bring down the sp. Performance and uncertainty are responsible. If the company is making money in the Q's, and is consistent/predictable, the sp goes up.

The pumpers are more damaging then the bashers. I can say that my DD, looked at in the positive/cheerleading light of this message board, but most importantly, in conjunction with comments from CEO's like Turley, gave me a false sense of stock certainty. While I was excitedly "loading the boat," people in the know (like Swartz) were dumping shares.

I can appreciate RG not talking about the MMP. If he is not permited, he's not permited. He is not getting anyone's hopes up. Now, when it possibly produces, we may go for a ride because expectations aren't figured into the stock price.

Why would he start this BS with Crossflo? Everything should be in the open for all share holders. It makes me upset thinking that others in the know could have easily been buying at 9 cents and then selling for 15-16.

With past history to look back on, including the loyalists of longs, why wouldn't you be skeptical of anything flowing from the top. CJ and Swartz, give me a break.

All in my opinion.

I am still optimistic. GLTAL