Agree
"All I know is RG has made some very clever decisions that look like a good fit for the political and financial position we find ourselves in."
AS for the MMP. I find it curious that we have not persued infringers in Germany. Is it that we are waiting for the German Courts written decision? Or is there a squeeze play going on trying to get either, Moore, or TPL to leave? We are currently not contributing to PDS, Hmmmm? Arn't we legally obligated to contribute? Isn't their a minium balanced required by the PDS Agreement? Something is going on there, hence the "we have conferred with our SEC lawyer" statement. I don't think anyone would want to buy the MMP right now, it is not making money. We know that Moore and TPL are in strong disagreements, has one or both of them approached us about excluding the other. The optimum partnership would be Moore and PTSC, but TPL would want too much for a buy out, unless there would be no more money coming in from the MMP. Hence, the squeeze play. Moore is not contributing with the USPTO any longer, and PTSC is not contributing to the PDS funds. If someone goes bankrupt then all agreements are off. And I believe if PDS is not profitable as an enity, all agreements are off. Moore will not continue his alliance with TPL, that is over IMO. If Moore does not contribute with the USPTO re-exam and we fail in an appeal, then there is nothing to buy. Until he is made happy no one is buying anything. Moore speaks of friendship and betrayal, he seems to lack all trust in TPL. That's why I think it is finished between that arrangement.
With all this going on, and investors being left in the dark, if I were PTSC I think that would definately confere with SEC attroneys.