<The outcome sought by PTSC backers was not to receive a final office action from the USPTO re: the 336.>
IMHO the outcome shareholders want is recertification of enough of the MMP as to make the portfolio licenseable. I still think that outcome is quite possible.
But to answer your specific questions.
No, I have no authority to overrule the USPTO and never claimed I did.
As far as whether the USPTO's rejections are on solid ground - Why would you think that some authority is needed to have any opinion about that? Every shareholder who has any significant amt of $ invested in PTSC should have read the '336 rejection at least twice, listened to what others say, and formed some opinion on it. I see nothing wrong with voicing one's opinion on such an important issue. Have you formed an opinion about the '336 final office action?
Opty
