<Our verbal agreement was that Leckrone and I would share expenses and revenues 45/55%. Never did we agree that Leckrone would own the Project or S40. He claims he does and acts like he does: he micromanaged the project; he fired the employees; he confiscated the inventory; he disposed of lab equipment. All without consulting me, reimbursing me or obtaining my consent.

He does own some IP, a portfolio of Array Patent applications. But I own S40. I designed the chip and provided 55% of its development cost. I own the IP of the design and of the tools that created it. He can do nothing without my support, which he has thrown away. >

This is weird stuff. If Leckrone is claiming ownership of the S40 chip, why fire the people and kill the project? Has to be a difference of opinion on commercial viability. What else makes any sense?

Opty