Do you mean this:

The court also denied the plaintiffs’ motion to allow Higgins to testify, on the ground that any testimony adverse to Moore would violate Higgins’s fiduciary duty to Moore, and because the court found that Moore had validly asserted the attorney-client privilege to prevent Higgins from testifying

http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinion...

Back to court in California where the original judgment was given and anything said by Moore is covered by Client Confidentiality.

Be well