Mosaic ImmunoEngineering is a nanotechnology-based immunotherapy company developing therapeutics and vaccines to positively impact the lives of patients and their families.

Free
Message: GJXMD and Crossflo- Lawenforcement

GJXMD and Crossflo- Lawenforcement

posted on Feb 25, 2009 05:02PM
How law enforcement
agencies are implementing
GJXDM

“In law
enforcement,
lots of systems
contain data, and
it’s important to
be able to turn it
first into usable
information
and then into
intelligence.”
— Lt. John Aerts,
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s
Department
rape case going cold. A
media-circulated suspect
composite generating no
leads. A brand-new regional data shar-
ing system that had barely been tested.
Gary, Indiana, Police Chief
Garnett Watson figured he had
nothing to lose. He logged onto the
new system and started searching
addresses near where the rape had
occurred. Before long, the system
returned a hit — the name of a subject
with whom neighboring Hammond
Police Department officers have had
contact. The subject was already
in jail on a different sexual assault
charge.
This conclusion probably wouldn’t
have been reached had the Gary and
Hammond police departments not
been sharing data via the Global
Justice XML Data Model (GJXDM).
A way for law enforcement agencies to
share records and other data without
investing in new systems or paying
their existing vendors to customize
interfaces with each other, the
GJXDM underlies several regional
data sharing initiatives around the
United States. National adoptions
includetheAmberAlertsystemandthe
Regional Information Sharing System
(RISS), but local agencies are sharing
too. Following are just a few examples
of how police are putting GJXDM to
use in their broader communities.
T h e
N o r t h w e s t
I n d i a n a
Criminal Justice Network
The Northwest Indiana Criminal
Justice Network began when two
agencies, already using New World
Systems’ Aegis product, recognized
the resources they could leverage by
implementing New World’s Regional
Data Sharing (RDS) product.
According to Ken Lang, New World’s
vice president of marketing, RDS
extracts data from Aegis and other
disparate public safety systems into
an XML document, then formats
the data using Extensible Stylesheet
Language (XSL). It therefore supports
a subset of the GJXDM Version 3.0,
including cases, offenses, subjects,
property, booking, warrants,
arrests and accidents. The
RDS version featuring
complete
GJXDM
conformance (as far
as the standard has
been written) will
be released later
this year.
R D S
became
By Christa Miller
A

available in 2001. In 2003, the
Hammond PD approached the Gary
Police Department about sharing the
system’s cost. The Gary PD, which
had recently acquired Aegis CAD/
mobile system, agreed to buy the
RDS server if Hammond PD bought
the software. The two agencies ran
the newly created network over a T1
line and then began to reach out to
others. Since then, the East Chicago
Police Department, the Lake County
Sheriff’s Office, about 12 of the 17
local jurisdictions inside the county
and even the regional High-Intensity
DrugTraffickingArea(HIDTA)have
joined. The HIDTA’s intelligence
links to the FBI, DEA, ATF and
ICE, and other federal agencies give
the local and county agencies added
resources.
Not all agencies in the network
use Aegis. The Lake County Sheriff’s
Office uses Spillman Technologies’
RMS, so joining the New World-
driven RDS constituted a true
interoperability test. (Spillman is
also working toward GJXDM
conformance.) Yet the other agencies
wanted the sheriffs department to
join the network because so many
offenders — especially those who
commit felonies — go to the county
jail following arrest. New World,
located in Troy, Michigan, built a
custom interface to Spillman’s
database, which cost the agency
extra. Additionally, to allow smaller
agencies to join, the network bought
several user seats and allows some
small members to use them for
free. “It’s definitely a way for small
agencies with small budgets to have
a robust system they otherwise could
not afford,” Lang notes.
Besides the implications for cases
such as the rape in Gary, Watson
decided to invest in RDS to promote
officer safety and productivity. (He
calls it “Google for cops.”) The Gary
PD is the largest agency in Lake
County, making numerous criminal
contacts per year, so Watson believes
participation in the network is a “no
brainer.” “It really gives us an edge
when dealing with offenders,” he
says. “The more information cops
on the street have, the safer they
are. For example, the records we
see from the other agencies include
every photograph they’ve ever
taken of various offenders, which
is important because offenders’
appearances can change over time.”
As the RDS implementation
continues, Watson anticipates more
creative uses. “We’re talking about
computerizing our field interviews,”
he says, “as well as standardizing
offense reports across all jurisdictions
on the network.” Pull-down menus
and other automatic aids would
help officers avoid misspellings,
which can confuse search efforts.
Watson distinguishes between
information and intelligence sharing.
Information such as criminal
records, field contacts, and wants
and warrants are sharable with
everyone; intelligence may involve
deeper digging. “The officers can’t
just pull the information into their
squad cars, but the resources exist,”
he says. “We have a good rapport
with the HIDTA intelligence center,
and if we need intelligence, all it takes
is a phone call.” The network does
make it easier to combine resources;
two investigators looking for the
same information can collaborate.
Although the indirect link to the
federal agencies is now used only for
drug investigations, Watson hopes
other investigations will follow. In
the meantime, the network will
continue reaching out to other
Indiana law enforcement agencies.
“It’s easy to buy into RDS, because
agencies still own their data and
thus control who accesses it,” he
says. To that end, the network’s
goal is to achieve interoperability
with I-CLEAR, the Illinois Citizen
and Law Enforcement Analysis
and Reporting System. A joint
Chicago Police Department-Illinois
State Police effort, I-CLEAR
integrates Chicago’s Citizen and Law
Enforcement Analysis and Reporting
(CLEAR) and the state police’s Law
Enforcement Agencies Data System
(LEADS)towarehousebothagencies’
significant criminal histories in one
package,allowingeveryIllinoisagency
to access and analyze the data.
COMMUNICATIONS SPOTLIGHT

The RISA project
The Los Angeles county justice
community had been part of a
data sharing effort for nearly 20
years before being approached to
join RISA in 2004. “We’ve been
using real-time data sharing with
the California Department of
Justice since 2001,” explains retired
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s
Department Lt. John Aerts, now a
consultant with his former agency.
“When our officers make an arrest,
the subject’s entire state criminal
record is pulled into our system
within minutes.” Aerts, who’s
involved with the GJXDM Task
Force, as well as the initiative to
replace the National Incident-Based
Reporting System (NIBRS) with the
National Data Exchange (NDEx), is
well acquainted with the standard.
RISA originated as a local San
Diego Harbor Police Department
(HPD) program to help predict
potential terrorist and criminal
activities. Then-Chief Betty Kelepecz
wanted to integrate pre-incident
indicator data from San Diego’s
Airport Access Control System,
Marine Operations Information
System and Port Activity Data
System, as well as field incident report
(FIR) data stored in HPD’s Records
Management System (RMS). “We
use FIRs when we make contact
with suspicious persons whose
activities, like videotaping bridges,
aren’t enough to arrest them,” Aerts
says. “Every officer writes FIRs, and
every agency’s RMS should handle
them. They’re a compact version of
full incident reports, so everything
— person, vehicle, location and
narrative information — is shown.
We wanted all the officers to see
whether other agencies had come in
contact with the same subjects.”
With all these components
in mind, Kelepecz turned to San
Diego-based Crossflo Systems to
provide a scaleable data sharing
platform for the pre-incident
indicator project. She also wanted to
use the suite of intelligence analysis
and visualization tools developed
by Memex Inc. to turn the collected
data into actionable intelligence,
hoping the network would show
patterns of potential behavior she
wouldn’t otherwise have observed.
Knowing other agencies would
benefit from the same information
collected in San Diego, she asked
Crossflo to regionalize her project.
TheMemexintelligencemanagement
and analysis system had already
been integrated with Crossflo’s
data sharing solution, so Crossflo
needed only to use its middleware
solution, DataExchange, to give the
additional agencies a way to share
their FIR data. Aerts says not every
agency saved FIRs in an RMS, so
the project needed DataExchange
to consolidate all the FIRs with the
other information. “DataExchange
allows information to move among
disparate systems via GJXDM,”
says Aerts. “Without it, we would’ve
had to pay each repository’s vendor
to publish information on their
separate servers, then translate it
into XML for subscribers — the
other departments — to view.
DataExchange bypasses that step
by connecting its DataExchange
Agent to each database to take care
of all translation, publication and
subscription issues. It allows the
agency to do business as it always
has: once an officer hits ‘Send,’ the
agent moves that information to
the DataExchange Server, where it
publishes for the subscriber to see.”
Aerts says this solution respects
agencies’data ownership needs. “The
DataExchange Server maintains
publishing and subscription rules.
Each originating agency decides
what percentages of its data can
be seen by public defenders, courts,
other law enforcement agencies
and other criminal justice entities,”
he says. “The server acts like a
traffic cop, directing the flow of
information.”
The RISA pilot proved the
GJXDM’sabilitytomoveinformation
and that it could work as a functional
solution. “Depending on the number
of agencies wanting to join, you
might need to scale it larger, but
this solution could be implemented
anywhere in the nation,” Aerts says.
CrimeCog’s small-agency
solution
CrimeCog Technologies Inc.’s
solution is unique in that its target
market is composed of small- to
medium-sized agencies. Although
the company prefers not to disclose
its client list or grant media
contacts, chief technology officer
Sam Basilico notes its network is
growing quickly after just two years
of being in business.
CrimeCog’s origins lie in TRW
Inc., which once provided mission-
critical applications to the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention,
the American Red Cross, and
automobile manufacturers. TRW’s
Criminal
Justice
Information
System (CJIS) had been deployed
to small rural communities when
Northrop Grumman acquired
TRW and shut down all application
service provider (ASP) projects,
including CJIS. At that point,
CrimeCog’s founders, one of whom
is a retired command officer with
the Michigan State Police, began
working with Northrop Grumman
to license its solution, E*Justice
System, to pick up where CJIS had
left off. (Northrop Grumman is
“You can use the
GJXDM to share
anything; in fact,
the more resources
you add ... to an
intelligence-driven
police system, the
better.”
— Lt. John Aerts, Los Angeles County
Sheriff’s Department
COMMUNICATIONS SPOTLIGHT

currently implementing E*Justice
as part of its contract to integrate
Puget Sound, Washington, law
enforcement agencies.)
E*Justice is an Oracle application;
so through the GJXDM, it’s
compatible with all CAD, RMS and
like interfaces. However, Northrop
Grumman targets a market of larger
agencies whose budgets range from
$60 million to $100 million.
CrimeCog, which is privately funded
by angel investors and builds its
solution on an ASP, can afford to
keep costs low: just $300 per user to
cover Northrop Grumman royalties.
“The ASP provides the ability to
share infrastructure cost among
users,” says Basilico. “One server
supports over 200 officers, so no
agency has to buy its own. This also
means the agency doesn’t have to
pull an officer off the street to
perform
routine
information
technology maintenance.”
The low overhead also enables
Milford, Michigan-based, CrimeCog
to supply customers with any
equipment they need, including in-car
computers. Although DHS grants will
help offset the burdens many agencies
face from the cuts to the COPS, Byrne,
and other grant programs, Basilico
warns the money won’t be able to
buy or upgrade computers. “We’ve
made it part of our mission to provide
all the tools agencies need to share
information.”
The end CrimeCog product is
an enterprise solution that tracks
offenders from incident through
criminal justice system, but its
potential doesn’t end there. Because
it’s an incident-based application, it
can be used to track information in
any situation, including mass casualty
events or immigration enforcement
initiatives. Basilico says police
departments could interface with fire
or other departments by extending
CrimeCog’s search capability into the
relevant agencies’ databases. Even
citizens can view limited information,
such as sex offender information, via
Web portal to the CrimeCog data
center.
CrimeCogisworkingtodevelopwhat
Basilico calls “pockets” of four to five
integrated counties. “Criminals don’t
stop at borders,” he says. Depending
on how much data an agency wants
to share, it can take a matter of days
or weeks to build an interface with
a disparate system. “Many of our
clients prefer to share only basic data,
like names and offenses. If requesting
officers want more than that, they
can call the agency that owns it and
cooperate with their investigators.”
CrimeCog makes data entry as well
as sharing more efficient. “An officer
might typically take several hours
to enter 28 different kinds of data,”
Basilico explains. “CrimeCog reduces
that time by half, because the officer
only enters the data once and the
system ‘remembers’what’s been entered
after that.” CrimeCog also streamlines
efficiency is at the corrections level. One
of the company’s clients uses the system
to check inmate biometric identification
to ensure the right person is being
released and that no warrants have been
issued prior to release.
In sum, says Aerts, “We’ve been
ready and able to use the GJXDM;
it’s just been a matter of getting others
on board. It’s been very helpful to
us, in fact, that the DOJ and DHS
now require GJXDM conformance
as a condition of their grant funding.
You can use the GJXDM to share
anything. The more resources that are
added — for instance, traffic citations
and sex offenders — to an intelligence-
driven police system, the better. In law
enforcement lots of systems contain
data and it’s important to be able to
turn it first into usable information
and then into intelligence.”
Christa Miller is a freelance
writer based in southern Maine. She
specializes in public safety issues
and can be contacted through her
Web site www.christammiller.com.
COMMUNICATIONS SPOTLIGHT
Electronically reprinted with permission from Law Enforcement Technology, May 2005
11995 El Camino Real Suite 302
San Diego, California 92130
Telephone: 858.724.2216
Toll-Free: 888.583.0333
Fax: 858.724.2224
www.crossflo.com
So much in this article to enjoy and savor about Crossflo and law enforcement. Page 3 is the most direct. But there is more info as you read along. I am not sure about the date of the article, but it does mention "data exchange " so it is not that old. Also there is a part towards the end that say organizations have to be compliant with the systems to get funding from grants. More incentive to join the system. And there is discussion of cost savings. etc....

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply