Re: New Pacer--OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFFS HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA, INC. TO
posted on
Jan 22, 2009 07:30PM
"EDOT Markman determined infringement only. In other words all the claims but one, that being claim 29 of the 584, the judge determined that the J's product infringed."
Ahhhhhh...On what legal basis was that determined???.....
IMO, the Judge only decided on the legal framework (word/phrase interpretation), on which legal argument could be argued in his court for this case only. In nearly all of the other word/phrase interpretations, the Judge agreed on TPL's interpretation, with the exception of the 584- Claim 29.
Virt