``Believe it or not, most states would say that those are separate duties with separate obligations. There are ways to get around it (concepts such as ``offset`` and others), but generally speaking, if the painter has done a competent job, you must pay....``

This isn`t meant to take you to task on your opinion, but Ron, if you were to jot down a list of expected competencies and deliverables from B&O (outside of a favorable ruling), what would those be? - is it limited to accurate preparation and timeliness? Presentation quality? Attention to detail?

When is a contingent case not a contingent case? Do those words imply reimbursement for expenses, not labor in even of an unfavorable ruling? What in your opinion counts for ``Expenses`` (minus labor)in this case.

I`m interested in getting Jeff`s response....

Kind Regards.