Why did TPL issue a separate pr on the NECA settlement, when all parties had settled? Both prs issued within minutes of each other and are worded exactly the same. And if the MOU is just some agreement on terminology used in the settlement or anything else so mudance, why wasn't NECA included? This is a perfect example of the weirdness that seems to crop up everywhere you look. But IMHO excluding NECA from the MOU is significant. If anyone can explain it away as meaningless, please do so. All IMHO Opty