And here we have it, Kramisman's explanation for R&B's "reasonable behavior". I'm glad you put a lot of thought into that response.

I opened the door, solicited a response, encouraged discussion, suggested I'd maintain an open mind to your explanation, and this is what we get. I guess you can't explain it either.....the non-defense defense - ignore the facts and attack a non-existent perceived vulnerability. Pssst: I don't work. And it's a an obvious seregate further insult to the intelligence of EVERYONE here, IMO.

But hey, I KNOW nuttin'!

SGE