Sorry you had to state the obvious to me, but maybe the proponents of this strategy should also state the other obvious - who knows what Fish would be looking for in order to do this - 20,30,50% of the patent rights? Would it be worth it? What if we give it to him and we still lose the ownership issue? Are we, as shareholders, willing to risk half the patent rights for a possibly risky lawsuit? Do you think Fish has any animosity towards PTSC, based on our lawsuits with him? Do you think he will just bend over backwards to help us because it`s the right thing to do? It might have worked with Ethicon, but were the inventors in an adversarial relationship with Ethicon previous to that?