"Never happen , if that was the case why would the Dec lic come in ."
The Law suits in question were not filed until Feb. 19, 2008. Rick our CEO mentioned the stop off point in the 10Q as Jan., 2008. Interesting.
3rd lawsuit filed (ASUSTEK COMPUTER,INC. vs TPL
Posted by: wolfpackvolt on February 19, 2008 11:41AM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ASUSTEK COMPUTER,INC., Plaintiff (s),
v.
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, ET AL., Defendant(s). No. C 08-00884 EMC ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Honorable Edward M. Chen. When serving the complaint or notice of removal, the plaintiff or removing defendant must serve on all other parties a copy of this order , the Notice of Assignment of Case to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial, and all other documents specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2. Counsel must comply with the case schedule listed below unless the Court otherwise orders. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Multi-Option Program governed by ADR Local Rule 3. Counsel and clients shall familiarize themselves with that rule and with the material entitled ADispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California@ on the Court ADR Internet site at www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov. A limited number of printed copies are available from the Clerk=s Office for parties in cases not subject to the court=s Electronic Case Filing program (ECF).
CASE SCHEDULE -ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM
Date
Event
Governing Rule
2/11/2008
Complaint filed
4/30/2008
|