Based on the first Pacer:
"1 The ASUSTek action has one additional defendant, MCM Portfolio LLC (“MCM”). Plaintiffs believe that MCM is merely a patent holding company that is owned or controlled by the other defendants, thus presenting no material difference in the identity of the defendants."
It would appear that this my be a holding company for TPL? Thanks for asking Hawk.
Good luck to you, me, us, and all longs.