Re: April 9th - 30.5Mil plus 20Mil/yr for 7 more yrs.
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 06, 2008 06:01AM
Obselesence would only potentially become an issue if the ongoing payments were royalties based on the magnitude of continued use of the technology. What was proposed in the conjecture were payments of a fixed amount annually over time. Thus, obselesence would not be an issue.
JMHO,
SGE