He states: "Having said the above about class actions, which are virtually always filed to recover money damages, there are other types of legal actions that could possibly be taken which would not involve money damages --- such lawsuits don't just reward lawyers, and are filed to require a company to act, or refrain from acting, in certain ways. For instance, I could envision some type of legal action filed to block an undesirable merger/acquisition, or to block an attempt to take the Company private, or under other circumstances which would, in effect, constitute a buyout of the Company that would convert the retail shareholders into bagholders. "

How can Dil be accused of bringing up litigation when it was Wolf who alluded to it (then denied having done so) on October 28 (4:56)? Now, after demanding that Dil stop discussing litigation, you post other possilbilities for it.

What is wrong with this picture?