While I agree re: "we only need one", I don't understand why you keep saying this:

"If Congress had passed the proposed patent bill which changes the way damages are calculated, they could have saved a lot of money. Enough money to make this fight worthwhile."

Have you read the proposed legislation? Apparently not..... I've pointed this out to you before, and now I do it one last time: the legislation will only affect new patents granted one fully year after the legislation is passed. This is per my last reading of the draft legislation.

Thus, even if that legislation had been passed 6-7 years ago, it wouldn't affect us, and the Js wouldn't have saved one shiney dime. Got it?

Now, please don't ever bring this up again, or show me where the draft legislation had changed to support your "statement of fact".

TIA,

SGE