<or with respect to potential licensing agreements broader in scope than the claims of the litigation>

OK, why make such a statement? Why not just leave it that they did not come to any settlement agreement on the MMP at mediation? Perhaps in order to save face, the J2.5 want to include some other license(S) from TPL that are not part of the litigation? We settled because it was the desire to obtain the other licenses, not that they thought they were on shaky ground with the MMP. Certainly would need the 30 days to sort through what to charge for the other licenses, even if MMP is essentially settled. Opty