See if this sounds like what could have happened.I'm starting this from when the judge should have responded to the ACP.

The Judge gets all parties together.

The Judge says ACP is being upheld.

Judge says both Moore and Fish worked together driving each others creativity so both of them being named on each of the patents is acceptable.

Markman results ruled out prior art and obviousness.

What was left? Nothing!

So if the Judge had answered to the ACP thru pacer it would be like saying the case is over when yet it wouldn't be over yet.

Next step would have been an MSJ as SGE1 has been eluding to all this time. Judge probably tipped his response to an MSJ if it would be submitted as well.

The judge finally says to all I would negotiate settlement if I were you. Which is what resulted in the 30 day Stay.

Am I close to what all here are speculating?

This is only speculation

GLTAL