Okay, so you never said JT was inept, just "unprofessional and indicates poor coordination and management of information coming from the company"! Then you acknowledge that the Webcast isn't that big a deal, then that it is, and then repeat the above quote. Hmmmm.

And you still don't get it. I could easily imagine more than the two - four possible scenarios I cited as very valid reasons to cancel without giving the reason you demand, unless of course you want him to lie about it.

Nope, just fire away with ""unprofessional and indicates poor coordination and management of information coming from the company" with no real evidence to support that statement - nada.

It is obvious to me at least that something happened during the day yesterday that surpassed the level of importance for JT's time today than an unnecessary Webcast to provide already given information. This is an echo of what Milestone was saying - I was just suggesting that we shouldn't necessarily expect a PR before the open today (as Milestone did suggest), as the possible "event" today may not be revealed until a later date.

So I'll ask again, in a way that maybe you'll capture, who is being "unprofessional" here? Oh, you're not a "professional", just a critic with no basis. Okay!

And you totally miss the prospect that this turn of events may be an unintended "signal" (or not - figure that out - he may have done some a huge favor - intentionally - at least those witty enough to think it through).

Sorry for being a bit terse, but this multiply repeated baseless criticism is a bit over-the-top IMO.

JMHO,

SGE