I did not intend being obscure. Sorry if it came off that way. Here's what was said:

Ignited stated the following:

" He is risking his future career as an expert in high tech with his subsequent performance."

I answered:

"Absolutely! It's hard to believe that a man like Turley would not want the very best for this company. With PTSC's success, he has everything to gain and nothing to lose. Why would anyone think that he does not have the best interest for the company as his personal #1 project?"

What would Turley gain if the company were to fail? You're making it sound as if he's deliberately "scuttling the ship". Why can't he be allowed to run the company for more than 4 months without all this ferocity. Why?