My apologies, I misread that.  Your correction obviously points out that license fees are significantly lower now than they've been in the past.  While I know fees are supposed to be based on the level of infringing product that these companies make/sell, it is very disheartening and concerning that compnanies with combined annual revenues exceeding $4B warrant only $1.5M in license fees.  While I don't know much about Bull other than it's an IT company, and LEGO obviously brings to mind plastic blocks WITHOUT microprocessors, based on the license value, these would be very minor signings by any measure.  When you read the PR's associated with these licenses, they sure don't read as though you'd expect their combined license fees to be only $1.5M.

Also, to correct myself additionally, the Sept revenues of $1.433M are for TWO licenses as well, not just DENSO.  DMP Electronics signed in September also.  Again, based on previous licenses, $0.75M per company seems to be going in the wrong direction not to mention, contrary to what TPL and PTSC have been telling us with respect to license fees.  Even at 500 infringing companies, PTSC's share of half of  $375M isn't exactly what I thought we should be expecting based on information from PTSC and TPL.

While I can't make it to the SHM, I hope this issue will be honestly and forthrightly addressed by PTSC/TPL.