From the Sept post of pacer by Wolf re Paiintiffs reply in support of motion to strike deposition testimony of Willis E. Higgisn.
<Upon careful analysis, the district court in Northern California ruled Higgins's testimony inadmissible in 2005. The Federal Circuit affirmed that decision in 2006. >
Either that is in fact the case, or we lied to Judge Ward. Put the nail in the coffin on that one please. Opty