I'll try again.  You suggest that the poster of a very poorly written message/opinion would, to the average reader, carry the same credibility as the writer of an extremely well written message.  I suggest not.

You used the example of the Iranian President speaking to the UN with an open shirt.  I suggested that he probably would have had a greater "presence" if he were better, most professionally dressed (at least until he opened his mouth).  You suggest it didn't matter how he dressed.  Then I offered the example of him wearing a thong, carrying an umbrella, and sporting Bozo shoes.  I believe that anyone, stepping up to the podium at the UN dressed in this fashion, would have zero credibility going in.  You can't see that?  You can't see the parallel?

SGE