Your kidding right?  Intel, AMD, Sandisk or any other company for that matter does one thing, they stick to their core competency.  Sure they evaluate potential emerging technologies but at the end of the day they stick with what they know.  Thats the difference between them and PTSC.  The reality is we really don't have a core competency at the moment.  That gives Mr. Turley plenty of room to shop around and venture into different areas.  It has nothing to do with Intel or any other company being more savy.  Sometimes when your starting over, like we are, it gives you more freedom to think outside the box.  Thats not always the case when you work for a large multi-national.

As far as your " you get what you pay for" statement, I can say without a doubt you are 100% incorrect.  I work for a small micro-cap thats been in business for over 40 years.  We have a very small float that could easily be attained for around $70 million.  We are very profitable and generate revenue over $200 million annually.  You would probably ask, " Well than why haven't you been acquired?"  Thats the beauty of it, there are many successful small caps that rock along generating very little publicity.  Most of them, like us, prefer it that way.  We aren't looking to be on anyone's radar.   With the right connections and networking, Mr. Turley could find a company of similiar size that fits his strategy.  Mr. Turley said a time line of 12-18 months, that should give PTSC more time to build cash.  If we win in court, than it could happen much sooner.  If we lose, than we still have $20+ million in the bank.   That's a hell of lot better than most startups.