I was under the assuption that the defendants are trying to use information from Higgin's testomony to find incosistencies with data used during the initial patent filing. If the defendants could prove that there was some false information filed with the original patents, could that lead to the courts finding the patents invalid?

I am on the edge of my seat. I attribute my staying power to information I read on this board. Ease, Wolf, and SGE are a few of my favorite posters. Ron is truly missed. Thank you for your wisdom and efforts.

I really like the direction this company is going. If we can get past the next few hurdles: PTO, Trial/settlement, legislation; Patriot should thrive under JT.

This is all in my very humble opinion. I only know what I learn from this board.