Precisely because of the Markman results ('148 and '336). I believe we "won" the Markman on those patents, and with our Claims Construction desired interpretations in place, we have grounds. Those interpretations are key to a jury trial. They are the only interpretations that will be heard. With those interpretations, we have a much greater likelihood to prevail in trial (that's why they were/are such a big deal). Save the court's time and trouble, grant our motion for SJ, likely forrcing settlements or refining court action to a damages trial.

I think I KNOW this stuff! (learnt it here!).

SGE