the posts regarding the stipulated judgement of non-infringement being worked on between TPL and ARM, and I know Ron has asked us not to speculate on what this means, and the sp certainly doesn't back up what I'm about to say, but I am going to speculate that if TPL would stipulate that ARM has not been infringing (past tense) it could only be because ARM is willing to purchase a license to cover future use of the technology.

I'm labeling this as the hype it is. But it sure would make sense.