Sorry for the blank!?

First:

Permit me to thank you for your DD. Especially, the PACER postings which have helped a great deal...

Second:..

I agree with you that the trial judge will make a short shrift of any Motions to Stay at this late date based on a review Grant by the PTO to PUBPAT...

Third:...

Although PUBPAT may be technically correct in claiming that there has been no "Final" adjudication by a Court of the 10 issues they raise as to the Patent's validity, they offer nothing new that was not before the Federal Courts in San Jose, and San Francisco, when Intel and Lackrone and company were contesting the same points...

The Court in Texas is concerned with the case before it, and with "Moving it along" to its conclusion pursuant to Federal Rules of Practice. Especially, if these points were available to all defendants for over 2-3 years and they did not file any Article III Motions, (see Sandisk v. S.MT Electronics), and waited till the Markman Hearings to file for Stay...

They, (the Texas Court), didn't get their reputaion of being the "Rocket Docket" for nothing.

GLTA...

Gil...