Bush, nice post, altho I think your psychosis level is getting close to mine.
So, here's the way I see it TC, please enlighten us unbelievers and tell me where my thinking goes astray.
As I posted yesterday there were around 265m shares traded from 6/1/06 - 11/30/06. Let's say half those are buys and half are sells. Of those 132m in sells, 108m were regular trades between retail customers, and another 24m came into the float. By your logic, there were enough retail buyers to buy those 108m of regular trading shares, but for some reason, some magic threshhold was crossed at the 108m share mark and we needed a BIG ACCUMULATOR to pick up those extra 24m. And this BIG ACCUMULATOR is not required to make any SEC filing regarding the above because of "loopholes" (I find this stance particularly ludicrous, but that's just my opinion).
And your explanation of how you came to this conclusion was that you've analyzed the L2 info, and tracked mm secret codes, and looked at things that none of us understand.....and we should just take your word for it, because we just don't undertsand.
Well, as long as you've decided to take the time to tell us all how we just don't have that secret knowledge that you possess, I'll tell you what I think - I think I demonstrated last night that you were basing your conclusions on some info that was incorrect (35m warrants were not added to the pool in fiscal year 06, 50m of warrants were not bought this year). Whether you intentionally misinterpreted this info to fit your argument, I don't know, I'll leave that for the reader to decide, but leave no doubt, the info as you presented it was flat out wrong.
So what are we left with - shall we go with the conclusions of the "guru" who tells us we just don't understand, yet he, himself misinterprets info in the SEC filings, or should we go with common sense.
I'll let the reader decide.