Majority(shares held),even in a democracy...rules.
Good point. So if those who think they have a better idea got together and formed a coalition of shareholders (or as it has been described recently as a TRUST), this coalition of shareholders, if they could form a consensus, could speak with one voice and then they would be listened to and given the same considerations as S & L. IF the coalition of shareholders could show they represented a significant percent of ownership. Some good findings on shareholder trusts as a way to get power back to shareholders. But we are better off if we have a man of integrity at the helm (Pohl) and another man of integrity (Brian) who is working to increase shareholder value. Trust them to keep their word and make good on increasing shareholder value. Remember Pohl has mentioned a number of times that one of their TOP priorities is to get us off the BB. We have an amazing story to still unfold. Do you have any signs that there is fraud, trickery, scam going on? I have looked and questioned that for a long time. I came to the conclusion that Pohl is really trying his best to look out for the little guy as well as be responsible to S&L.
