I know you're just catching up, but I'm compelled to respond to hopefully reduce your ire.
First, re: Holocom debt: the debt holder has agreed to an arrangement where the debt will be repaid over time via a peice of the profits Holocom generates. No harm, really (and the debt holder had little choice - take this or they file BK and he gets nada. It was probably worth it for us to retain the known Holocom name).
Second, re: the deal with Fish: The deal they struck was way better than the deal it superceded, where Fish could potentially get $100M (if I recall correctly). The bigger thing was to get one more irksome hurdle out of the way.
Hope this helps. If not, pour another one! LOL
SGE