First, I'm certainly not alone in my opinion - just ask a majority of people on this forum.  With your apparent attitude - if we win we win small and have to develop multiple new businesses for multiple, small profit (if ever) revenue streams before the PPS will move.  Prompts one to ask why you're here.

To further respond, as has been pointed out many times, fund managers, etc., won't even look at a stock trading under $5/share, especially if it isn't listed on a major exchange. Why? If they get burned bad just one time, it's career over, credibility gone. And, IMO, 95% of penney stocks stay penney stocks or die.  So a fund manager type won't waste his valuable time.....

Remember, PTSC is in a peculiar, unique circumstance - not often encountered. 17 licensees, money in the bank (THAT alone is extremely unusual for a penney stock), thousands of infringers. Every fab, OEM - and I wonder about retailers, as it seems we should be able to go after any entity that financially benefited.

As for your other comments, they make me wonder if you absorb anything you're read on this board.  History: News, small pop, retreat. Answer: Warrants, traders.  Settlements considered small. Why? To develop credibility, validity in anticipation of litigation.

And you expect small money ($50M?) from the J2.5/ARM. IMO, $500M total from J2.5/ARM would be a fraction....  Don't you undersatnd that THEY are the big score?  And don't you understand that after success against them the "first mover discounts" will go away and all infringers will be paying more?  NEC apparently understands this.

Agreed that my comments, questions and answers are all a reflection of my opinion, and I KNOW nuttin'!

SGE