You say: "Watch what you say here. Criticism isn't taken lightly here. Apparently, the kool-aid drinkers think that it is part of Pohl's master plan to keep the shareprice down. Idiotic. Why would any company not want their shareprice to rise?"

You need to improve your comprehension skills. I assume I am one of the "kool-aid drinkers" you refer to. Please show me where I have EVER said that the plan is to keep the PPS down? Never happened.

What I have said is that IMO PTSC has a strategy in play where THEY won't do anything to bolster the PPS until the time is ripe to get the biggest benefit. Right now they would enjoy little/no benefit, primarily due to the outstanding warrants.

IMO, there is no intent by PTSC to hold the PPS down. I'm certain they would enjoy a rise in PPS. Their strategy IMO is to do NOTHING PR wise. Doing nothing means they aren't acting to effect the PPS either way. They're letting the market do what it's going to do, and watching as S&L sell into any news (so S&L can convert more warrants until they are gone).

And it doesn't make any difference what the PPS is at re: warrant conversion. They're (S&L) just swapping out share for share.

Do you get the difference here? And, BTW, I don't recall anyone else suggesting that PTSC is acting to hold the PPS down.

Yup, criticism isn't taken lightly when you totally mis-represent what others are saying, because you apparently don't understand or have an agenda.

FWIW,

SGE