Wondering now if the PubPat request was backed by ARM. Thought it might have made sense if they saw the potential for the existing requests for patent reexam pulled. As I understand it, the PubPat request would necessarily have to be different than the NEC and Toshiba's. Perhaps that is reason the PubPat request seemed so weak. But wouldn't it have been better to wait for the NEC/Toshiba requests to be yanked, and then PubPat could have used some/all of that amo. If that PubPat request was backed by ARM, they may have made a blunder. Any other thoughts.