Honestly, I don't believe we need or want an ignore feature. And, IMO, we don't need any "forum member(s) in control" feature. All we need is for Agora to be more aggressive in performing the function they currently perform.
Why did it take so long for my report re: Johnnyjr to be acted upon? Yeah, it was a Sunday, and yeah, more disruptive behavior (coincidently? LOL) seems to occur on weekends. Certainly he was reported multiple times on Friday/Saturday "pre-JR" before his boot on Sunday. I suspect that immediately "jr" was born and went right back at it. That's when I reported. Monitoring?
However, if there were swift action when disruptive or violating posts were initially reported, they could review and monitor, issue a warning (which might be helpful - but is rarely done) - one that could ding not only the errant poster, but also the responder/enabler - monitor a little more, then act, and check back for a reincarnation a little later.
This, IMO, would be most favorable , and avoid a perception of "board control with an agenda".
I recognize this would be a greater burden on Agora. Personally, I wouldn't mind paying a small subscription fee to offset costs (and such a thing would probably stop the "undesireables" - would you pay 5 bucks a month for posting privileges?).
IMO, it all falls under the category of "do it right". Or more like "walk the talk" - they advertise that they perform monitoring.
So IF Agora can come up with a way to "do it right", that would be the best of all worlds IMO.
JMHOs,
SGE