'Hearing' was probably an incorrect term... the jist of my post is that with Discovery we get to see just what the J3Arm has, and perhaps more importantly what they don't.. ie claims of prior art...

the purpose of discovery is to allow disclosure of all information that is reasonably relevant to the case in order that, once all parties are "armed" with all the facts and data, they are in a better position to evaluate the strengths and weakness of each others' cases. The whole concept underlying discovery, i.e., the ultimate goal, is settlement.

exactly..... If that is in fact what TPL wants.. the possibilty exists they may be looking to see this thing thru to the end.. fight this fight.. perhaps.. perhaps not. Regardless, we should see each side's strengths & weaknesses post Discovery.

Now, who can confirm Discovery date (it's changed so many times.. and a precursory check on Pacer did not tell me) I have it as currently Feb 23rd, is this correct?... if so that is a heck of alot closer than the Markman.

Thanks Ron... & corrections welcomed

-ps.. no decision yet on IS... probably try to find a slightly used one equiped as desired locally sometime this yr.. I'll let you know when & if we pull the trigger

-pps.. re black.. I love the look.. but the wife's current vehicle is black (Porsche 911) and she does not like how it so readily shows dirt..

-ppps... just kidding about the Porsche :)