i agree that things were done to keep the company alive in the past and they were an unfortunate necessity in our ongoing survival. but that was the past and we have emerged from the ashes a "new company" that is currently IP based. the new ptsc needs a facelift to reflect its new direction. i believe investors would applaud this BOD facelift. which of the BOD decisions would an investor view as a positive? the granting of in the money options? emptying the treasury in the form of a dividend? the weak repurchase of our stock at depressed prices? giving complete control to the release of settlement information to a private company? the concept of no royalties? shelving of ignite/inflame? no techincal engineers employed to develop our technologies? the empty office? which BOD decision do we applaud?

if we are a company with no technical employees, then our BOD better be a pretty nimble sharp bunch. even if you disagree with my opinions, a shakeup would be viewed, IMO, as a positive. is there a reason we cannot have a little more information regarding an acquisition? at least the sector, public or private company, synergistic with current IP? is it strategic reasoning they tell us so little or is it that they really have nothing to report other than the standard passifying pr blurbs? the BOD has had ample to time to provide the investor with more guidance than we have been given.....and the share price reflects this overall vagueness in PTSC's strategy. there is no meat on the bone. all I am asking is the BOD to at least toss the potential investor a little bone with some meat to chew on! SGE1 this post is not directed at you (i respect your opinions)....t'moto