Probably very little on a piece by piece basis. Keep in mind that there are a lot of (risk) factors that come into play. What`s the probability that this component infringes on some patent?

This is another thing that I think works in our favor. Though our patents are a bit aged, and there have been a few ``contests`` in their regard, only recently did they really surface. So for years, companies were probably under the impression that there was no infringement on chips, so why pay a premium for a Patent Infringement Clause, even at a marginal extra cost, when apparently are no infringement concerns? So companies that paid for the clause in the distant past may have abondoned that approach, as there was no apparent risk.

JMHO,

SGE