And to add to that sentiment- below is a cut & paste from Roses_NY @ Raging Bull -
1. ARM states its cores are NOT identical to the J3 cores.
2. The fact that a company has an indemnity clause does NOT mean they are not directly liable for infringement, only that they can turn to the indemnifier for redress.
3. An indemnity clause does NOT relieve the J3 defendants of their responsibility to examine prior art to insure that they are not infringing on third party patents.
SGE - Do these concepts hold water with you?
