Some here have complained about PTSC`s lack of control in its arrangement with TPL for the MMP. So you would prefer to create a situation where PTSC`s destiny would be further influenced by TPL`s activity, or lack of activity? What if PTSC were extremely successful in their non-MMP endeavors, and TPL`s efforts fizzled or were abandoned - you`d like to share in those profits and losses?

Bottom line, ``big picture``, is that if there were any interest in doing this (i.e., if it were advantageous to either company), they would have simply merged rather than teaming on MMP.

Other bottom line: If you commit to share profits, you can expect to share the burden of losses.

How many better-funded, very capable competitors does TPL have for its non-MMP products? How many competitors does PTSC have for its non-MMP products (that aren`t infringing), particularly regarding the remote charging technology? Level of competition determines, to a large degree, the probability of success or failure. Which has the greater likelihood of success?

And why introduce more risk to an enterprise already perceived as being very risky (OTCBB)?

Just some other scenes in the ``big picture``.

SGE