I agree with all your points. Them that say its a lame line about the FISH fail to realize it is merely a concern. A contract was signed when we were in dire need and this contract was generous to FISH. Not being a lawyer, I am not edumacated on the workings of such a contract, but what I have read tells me we have to deal with this guy AND we want him on our side when we go against the J3. So I take exception with the guy who said FISH deal was a non event, unless proven otherwise, I think it is a lurking alligator. Not bashing. Concerned at what lies ahead.