I would imagine there`s more to the settlement agreements than what`s in the 10q. The amount is one concern, but perhaps there are other items the J3 want to know about. And from my quick reading of the scheduling order, both sides in the J3 case are allowed to see settlement agreements that pertain to this case. I find it hard to believe that a good lawyer couldn`t make a sound argument for previous settlement agreements being germaine here.

Don`t get me wrong. I`d just as soon TPL/PTSC not show any more than they have to. But my uneducated guess is they (J3) will get a look at every page of every agreement thus far.

Hope I`m wrong.

JMHO.