I`m afraid that much of the mess going on here was started when I tried to explain to Ease why we couldn`t be valued at $5-6, at this time,and that imo we would have to look at each licensing deal,individually, as to the value it could add to the company. That being, at least, the amount of cash banked. A deal where most of the money is paid out for dividends would add less value than others where the cash was retained. This thinking was based on the acceptance that no more money would come from the deals. No disbursments,no royalty...no more money coming.

Along comes milestone posting concern over TPL/royalties,

share buyback before cleaning up warrants, and what I interpreted as his valuation given After Spending the Cash on Dividends. I don`t have to agree with everything he or anyone else says and unless it`s blatent, I guess I`m often oblivious to manipulation. To me they are either important and legitimate topics or they are not.

I thought those 3 topics were important and inter-connected

with the news coming out of the ASM that Mr. Pohl was getting serious about an exchange listing and had allready posted my thoughts that barring Rec. Rev. we should give up the dividend plan to get there, which I tried hard to explain but,I guess, failed miserably to articulate. To know about and look at the obstacles or problems is a part of solving them, which I firmly believe we will do, which is why my wife and I continue to hold a substantial and large percentage of the shares,we too, have owned for years. This has been a life changing year for many of us. I am forever grateful to PTSC and this board. Very happy for the long longs and proud to be a part of that.joe