TPL website and pr`s have all included the comment

regarding system manufactures and royalties. now at the

SHM we learn that it is not in the TPL business model.

TPL should have never stated that there were even the

potential for royalties if this was not the case. maybe

they have changed there mind regarding royalties (and

apparently PTSC has no voice in this). if they changed

the game plan then i wonder why. i see a potential

conflict of interest in the TPL side ventures and the

best interest of PTSC shareholders.

if this creates doubt on the negative side then consider

the opposite side of posters proclaiming to the moon

posts based on settlements that we have not obtained.

if the emperor wears no clothes....cant we at least point

this out. or do we blindly hold and invest in PTSC

because the inarticulate Pohl at the NY meeting a few

months back is now a smooth talker at the shm.

i dont want this to turn into a ``boot licker`` board

where the only discussion is based on a postive spin.

i appreciate and welcome all opinions and i can easily

click past the ones that have no merit. i have a

lot of questions now regarding PTSC than i did prior to the

SHM.

respectfully,

t`moto