Your current presence and your adamant defense of MEO raises several questions:

1) Are you a stockholder? If so you must have bought before the Cease Trade Order;

2) If you are a shareholder, where were you when the numerous discussions of the future of MEO and the future our investments were going on? I regret that I just don't recall your input. I think that I would have remembered you because I was also a staunch defender of MEO and their management until I could no longer, in good conscience, defend their actions;

3) If you are not a shareholder, why are you so concerned with the "honor and reputation" of MEO's management. Are you an attorney looking to incite someone into making defamatory statements?; and

4) Duncan has asked you to share the "expert" review" that you had conducted on the logs but you, rather cleverly, retorted that that was public information and he should get the data for himself. That is the kind on non-answer that may lead you to think about a career in politics.

If you are so sure that MEO management has been "wronged" by greedy shareholders and inept partners, then why don't you produce the data that will show that Morgan Highpoint was a viable well. You are currently inferring (very cleverly) that the project was a real company-maker and that it was only external forces (partners and shareholders) that derailed MEO progress to profitablility.

If you are really an MEO shareholder that has information that can show that MEO has what it takes to really produce the goods (and not just spend $10,000,000 without adding any shareholder benefit), I will be the first to admit I was mistaken.

If you didn't suffer the losses that so many of us did (and some still do suffer), I suggest that put all the money you have into the "new MEO." Maybe then, you will come to know our POV.

I look forward to clear answers. No more obfuscations.

- panamax