Hello,
I am pretty new to this message board stuff but wanted to point out that you did shoot down the whole gravity theory. Figured it is more appropriate to contact you off the board then reduce this to a pissing match which isn't my intention. You bring a good wealth of knowledge and inform the other members. Not sure what you involvement in the industry is (geo I suspect) but in any new discovery it is the first drill hole always dictates the winner even if the property down the road has the mine.
Noront has a very good prospect. In time McFaulds will prove to be a successful mining camp. As to which company will be the "mother lode" is yet to be seen.
Attached your response below about gravity.
lol...I disagree entirely with your conclusions...First of all to suggest that "Gravity" is the best or superior method for discovering ore bodies at McFaulds is simply erroneous, as my post suggested...IF you believe you are correct than why not tell the Forum of all the Mineralized ore bodies discovered so far by "Gravity Anomalies" at McFaulds...
In my view , in Geology/Gephysics, one goes with what is proven as "FACTS", and not a hypothetical, to prove up "ore bodies"....There is absolutely no "evidence" or "facts" that Gravity Anomalies have ever found any ore bodies at McFaulds...Now one can be hopeful that maybe just maybe, Gravity will add to the overall picture at McFaulds, and perhaps help in some way...That's far and away from saying/suggesting that "gravity survey" will surely find the "motherlode" of the "ore mineralization" at McFaulds...
IMCO
JD*
|
